![]() | |
| |
Eye magazine's issue 36 (2000) on publication design featured ebr in a brief section about literature online. Tabbi, Burdick, and Amerika's response appeared in Eye 37 (Fall 2000).
Despite its omnipresence in daily life, the Internet seems a neglected
subject in contemporary literature. We wait anxiously for one of the giants
of modern fiction to produce the Great Internet Novel; perhaps Martin Amis
is already at work on a fiery tome investigating the new tensions in the
human psyche wrought by the e-revolution? One thing however seems certain:
when the Great Internet Novel finally arrives, it will appear as ink on
paper and not as a stream of electronic pulses on a publisher's pay-per-view
website. Because despite the efforts of media barons, electronic publishers
and e-literature enthusiasts to persuade us to read online, human beings
appear reluctant to read more than a few lines of text on a computer screen.
And this is understandable; the process is usually arduous, unsatisfactory
and probably one of those things like the one-legged high jump, simply not
meant to be done. The death of print, stridently predicted by Web evangelists
![]()
at the outset of the cyber revolution, has not happened yet. Nor does it
seem likely to; e-books have not supplanted printed books and e-zines have
failed to stem the seemingly endless flow of glossy magazines.
But a trawl around the sites offering online literature tends to confuse the
issue The current e-book smash hit is Stephen King's Riding the Bullet:
16,000 words for $2.50, and apparently no shortage of takers. In the interest
of research, I set out to find a site willing to let me read the master's
foray into e-horror. I ended up at www.glassbook.com, which offered me the
chance to download The Glassbook Reader, a mini-browser utilising Adobe PDF
technology and offering what the developers call "a high-fidelity reading
experience," which it does. The Glassbook Reader downloaded King's short
story in less than five minutes. The appearance is pleasant, typographic
detail is excellent and in all details, bar the faint milky-ness common to
all onscreen information, it faithfully replicates the character and style
of the printed page.
[...] Elsewhere, more highbrow literary sites offer electronic alternatives to inky periodicals. www.spikemagazine.com and www.richmondreview.co.uk are brave attempts to make palatable the experience of reading large amounts of text online. Both lack the poise and elegance of www.lrb.co.uk, the site of the London Review of Books and a paradignm of readability on the Internet. A more adventurous literary experience is offered at www.altx.com/ebr. A site for those interested in the literary postential of hypertext, ebr sets out to challenge the "hegemony of narrative." It founders on the familiar problems characteristic of all websites offering extensive amounts of text: the mediating effect of the computer screen itself; the mild nausea induced by scrolling through acres of type; and the gaptoothed rawness of HTML text.
(Further discussion of ebr.)